Another video is now online on YouTube: showing an animation of the 1/6 scale doll EMMA.
Was posted yesterday, but on YouTube so far only 7 viewers. It took quite a while until the "checking" was over. I think the gods on YouTube were trying to decide if the should ban the video, because of a possible impersonation of the actress Emma Watson, or because of the slightly "hot" behavior of the doll when stroking her leg and pulling up her skirt...
On TikTok this video is also online, but it is shown as 0 viewers - despite me having played it. Apparently, TikTok suppresses the number of viewers for this video. It might be "too hot" for the audiences on that site, even though it is not blocked.
n April 2026 I had done a photoshoot of the 1/6 scale doll "Penelope". I did create a 10 minute video, did crop it to fit 9:16 frame. But I never published it, because I was expecting that it would be turned down by those adult online sites, because it is AI and because it is "just" a doll.
Now I revisited the mix, took the NSFW ending out, and here it is: the new introduction of Penelope.
Trying out PixelDojo after it had its crash over the two weeks. But today and yesterday the tools that I used to employ on PixelDojo did function fine.
So I created a little video:
This video is in principle SFW, but I would still not view it at a work place. It does not show any nudity, everything is covered in clothing OK (e.g. panty hose), but one might feel that the upskirting is a bit too daring for the boss to see...
last year I began publishing my videos with content providers other than YouTube and TikTok. YouTube in particular has strict rules regarding content, and much of my videos were deemed not suitable.
It turns out, however, that also other video hosting website object to videos which show women who are animated with AI tools. I had to show proof-of-consent - which is quite difficult for a doll to obtain. Or easy, depends how you view it.
In any case, some of these hosting services were then satisfied when I could show convincingly that these are not deep-fake videos of real women, but are genuinely original doll animations. OK, so be it.
But just before Christmas, the web hosting company Faphouse deleted all my videos. Interesting - they do have a lot of smut, but my videos of dolls doing NSFW things were not acceptable. https://faphouse.com/
That is what they wrote:
After an internal audit, we have determined that the content in question violates our platform guidelines, and as a result, your studio OneSixthuals has been deactivated.
We appreciate your creativity and enthusiasm in uploading AI-generated videos. However, we would like to clarify our requirements regarding the appearance of characters in such content.
At this time, we are unable to verify whether the performer shown in your videos is an AI-generated character or a real person. When there is any uncertainty, we are required to treat the depicted character as if they were a real human performer, which means documentation for each co-performer is necessary to comply with our guidelines and industry regulations.
You are welcome to continue creating and uploading AI-generated videos in the future, but we kindly ask that the characters do not resemble real people, either visually or stylistically. Ensuring a clearly non-human, stylized appearance will help avoid compliance issues and future restrictions.
OK, so they closed it.
And I decided to make a video, simply SFW, where dolls explain that they are dolls, and I made this for the New Year 2026. I did hope that only idiots would take these dolls for real women, and that it is very easy to verify that the "performers" in this vide were dolls.
Well, there is nothing wrong with dolls who are being animated with AI to look like real women, is there? And this is a very decent SFW video, no nudity, nothing really obscene. There is no violation of anything, no privacy violation, no woman's rights are hurt.
So I did post this video on Faphouse.
And - it was rejected.
Here is what these idiots wrote:
Your video The Dolls Begin the New Year 2026 has been unpublished by our moderators.
This video, along with all posts featuring it, are no longer shown on site. To avoid any similar cases in the future, please refer to our Terms of use.
Reason: Your video has been unpublished by our moderators along with all posts featuring it, and will no longer be displayed on our site. Unfortunately, FapHouse doesn’t allow such content on the platform.
I am still wondering: what is wrong with this video that it violates some stupid idiotic guidelines of Faphouse?
OK, I will not post anything on Faphouse anymore, I am through with them. I will make my money somewhere else, and I will give other websites a hare of my profit then. These guys at Faphouse have not realized that AI is the future of porn. They cling to their mantra of "NO AI" and "NO realistic looking AI rendition of women".
They soon will not exist anymore, they will be out of business soon, if they continue this.
I will post this somewhere else, and I have already successfully posted it.
I am thinking of submitting something, but I do not know what. Must probably not be XXX, only PG-13, as KlingAI does object to adult material.
But I have currently absolutely no idea what video I could make. No story, no topic. Must probably be in English, if the dolls are speaking - so no Swiss Vroni there.
I will still try to come up with a convincing story by the weekend. The deadline for submitting the video is next week Wednesday.
On the site CIVITAI I did experiment a bit with VIDU Q1. This tool allows to provide a start and and an end image, then it interpolates between these images and creates a video.
I had taken the following series of 9 photographs:
I now used the first 8 images of this series as start images, then set the image following each of these images as the end image. Each of the end images was again used as the start image for the next video.
With VIDU Q1 I then created the 8 individual video snippets.
