New video online: Emma

Another video is now online on YouTube: showing an animation of the 1/6 scale doll EMMA.

Was posted yesterday, but on YouTube so far only 7 viewers. It took quite a while until the "checking" was over. I think the gods on YouTube were trying to decide if the should ban the video, because of a possible impersonation of the actress Emma Watson, or because of the slightly "hot" behavior of the doll when stroking her leg and pulling up her skirt...

On TikTok this video is also online, but it is shown as 0 viewers - despite me having played it. Apparently, TikTok suppresses the number of viewers for this video. It might be "too hot" for the audiences on that site, even though it is not blocked.

https://www.tiktok.com/@onesixthuals/video/7683158939046923542

New video online: Introduction of Penelope

 n April 2026 I had done a photoshoot of the 1/6 scale doll "Penelope". I did create a 10 minute video, did crop it to fit 9:16 frame. But I never published it, because I was expecting that it would be turned down by those adult online sites, because it is AI and because it is "just" a doll.

Now I revisited the mix, took the NSFW ending out, and here it is: the new introduction of Penelope.

The first upload I did on TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@onesixthuals/video/7682869496926883075 

Then I uploaded it onto YouTube:

The background music is my own creation: I did slow down my earlier renditions of two of Maurice Ravel's movements from "Ma mere l'oye".

Interesting TikTok statistics

For the first time I did now check the user statistics of my videos on Tiktok. And very interesting: must "users" only stay on each video for only 2 seconds.

Even considering that my videos may not be very popular, it is still quite unlikely that human users only watch 2 seconds and then already know that this is not for them. I suspect that these statistics does not come from human users, but from automated bots which scan the beginning of each new video posting and store / evaluate it somehow.

Here is the statistics for my mots recent video:

After 5 seconds there are only 1% of the original viewers still watching. These are the real humans. Therefore, one would need to take the reported number of viewers/listeners with a grain of salt - not to be taken too literally.

The same behavior is the same for ALL my videos on Tiktok - the "majority" of users only watches 2 seconds. The TikTok admins may need to do something about this and report a proper statistics, without including the automated bots which only peek once into each video.

A total number of 367 viewers is currently reported after I corrected the "non-licenced" audio of this video and replaced it with TikTok recommended audio. 10 Likes so fare, the most of all my videos on TikTok. And I assume these are not bots but real human viewers. :)

My new adult website is now online: OneSexthuals.com

Since March I do have this subscription to my own web site. But I have been struggling with the template and all the legal requirements, so the site was not yet ready for viewing publicly.

But now I have made it accessible to the public:

www.onesexthuals.com

The first screen that anyone sees is this:

The "Exit" link leads to my SFW videos on YouTube: 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC__X-0iJZ8gkb8bNSypjPXQ

The other link leads to the site itself:

The main feature of this new site are its videos:

Currently there are only 4, and they are SFW kind of introduction videos. This will be the starting point: each doll will introduce herself, with a video, some information about her, and just about her looks and movements.

Later there will be registration required for the more spicier videos. PG-18 will be observed by the need for registration. There will be a subscription fee for the basic videos, and then there will be really spicy ones for which one would pay separately. 

It is about time that I earn something with all my work, and without being subject to the peculiarities of all those adult sites which object AI-generated content and which also do not approve doll videos.

TikTok does not play my copright-free audio

Uploaded my newest video to TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@onesixthuals/video/7682022967995338006 

But no sound is playing.

This message appears:

It claims that the video has non-authorized sounds. 

Bullshit. I only used copyright-free audio from MS Clipchamp. YouTube had no problem, no copyright claim was filed after my upload to YouTube. But TikTok apparently has another algorithm. Probably a stupid AI algorithm...

It is time that I open my own site, with my own rules.... I hate to depend on those morons from all those commercial sites.

So now I have used TikTok sounds, offered by TikTok. This is the version exclusively for Tiktok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@onesixthuals/video/7682168865010224406

It is hard to find suitable music, and I am not happy with the selection I made. But that is how it is now.

New Video: Cathy is dancing

Trying out PixelDojo after it had its crash over the two weeks. But today and yesterday the tools that I used to employ on PixelDojo did function fine.

So I created a little video:

This video is in principle SFW, but I would still not view it at a work place. It does not show any nudity, everything is covered in clothing OK (e.g. panty hose), but one might feel that the upskirting is a bit too daring for the boss to see... 

Some details:

• 25 photographs
• doll head GACToys GC006-B
• doll body: JIAOU 06C-KT
• Voice: Vidnoz Connie
• Clothing: from various AliExpress vendors
• Music: from free MS ClipChamp library

Voices - TTS - with Vidnoz

For the OneSixthual dolls I need to assign each doll a particular voice, which fits to its character. I have experimented with several online tools, and here are my results.

Vidnoz for TTS Voices

I have used Vidnoz since 2 years, it was my first venture into AI-generated animations. At first I used their avatar mode: uploaded image of a doll, then made the doll speak by selecting a voice and added the text prompt. The result was then that the avatar spoke. 

This approach had the disadvantage that the avatars were quite unflexible, a bit stiff, and only the head moved together with the speaking. Mouth movement was OK.

So then I devised another more complicated method: Vidnoz also has a mode where audio-only can be generated, without the video. I used this to select from the voices the ones I liked, then entered the text prompt. The resulting wave file I then merged with DreamFace to an existing video snippet. 

Recording the voice

Vidnoz offers more than 1200 voices. It is quite difficult to find a suitable voice, one needs to try one-b-one. In the voice library one can filter by age:

Also one can filter by style: there are 34 different styles (e.g. newscast, whispering, etc.) and 17 scenarios (e.g. Training, Chat, Poetry, etc.), but it is still quite difficult to find a suitable voice, as these categories sometimes are not clearly describing the voice. This filtering is also available in editing mode.

And one can filter by language. It is actually great fun to select a language other than English, e.g. French, and then enter an English text - the voice then speaks English with an accent! 

And one can customize each voice: 

A great feature: one can preview the voice recording without needing to pay - this allows experimentation before the paid final version is recorded.

Using DreamFace for merging video with audio

The app DreamFace costs $30 per year, and credits can be purchased: 30 cr for $5, 1000 cr for $100. 5cr are added automatically weekly, but they expire after 1 week. I forgot how many credits a merging of the video with the audio costs... So I upload the video snippet, then the audio wave file, and I let the app do its magic. 

There are a few issues:

• DreamFace does not support NSFW videos, and it refuses the upload of a video which does contain such content. Therefore, one must only upload just a video close-up of the face that i supposed to talk.
• Multiple faces in a video are not supported. There must only be one clearly visible face.
• When the audio is longer than the video, the video at its and is added playing backwards. This ensures a smooth overall video, but it makes the video unusable in a context where its ending is pre-determined. Therefore, the video snippet should always be longer than the audio snippet.

Dreamface also does have its own voices, and they appear to have a great selection. But I have not used them yet, as I like the choices offered by Vidnoz.

Creating the final video

I then paste / merge the resulting video+audio into my overall video timeline, overwriting the previously non-speaking part with this new speaking part. For this I am currently using Microsoft ClipChamp, in the free version. Works fine for me.

PixelDojo seems to work again - albeit veeeery slowly

Since today was a news announcement on the PixelDojo site, without acknowledging or mentioning the big problems of the past few days, I followed my usual routine and tried the WAN 2.2. As the new instructions stated, one has to select "Image to Video LoRa" option in the drop-down menu on the left side. Then all the other options also appear: quality (480p), number of frames (100), fps (8),  LoRa (default), interpolate to 30 fps. 

Here are again the start and the end image:

 

And here are two results with this prompt:

"nsfwsks woman stands at pole, looking into the camera, camera zooms out until woman is completely visible, she is dancing at the pole with sexy movements"

  

Both are slightly different, which is the usual as I have set the seed to be random. There are a few AI artifacts, but I do not mind these very much. At least these videos both look mainly like what I wanted. So PixelDojo WAN 2.2 is just the very best for my needs.

(no) Alternative to PixelDojo: Kenerate AI

Since the recent demise of PixelDojo I am looking for alternatives. Kenerate AI was indicated on reddit as a possible alternative, so I gave it a try. 

Here are my results:

Price: $15 one time fee gives you 1300 credits. Which mean 1 cr costs about 1.15 Cent.

Trying out WAN 2.2 which I always used with great success on PixelDojo. 8 seconds cost here in 480p resolution 45 credits = 51 cents, which is 6.38 Cent per second of video.

Compare this with PixelDojo: 12.5 seconds for 18 Cent, which is 1.5 Cent per second of video. I did use there 5 seconds duration, but with a framerate of 8fps, which created then 12 second long video clips.  These were automatically upscaled to 30 fps.

Options at Kenerate: start and end frame.

The end frame was not used, and the requested zooming of the camera was not done, even though I had indicated this in my prompt.

So Kenerate AI is in no way a match for the lost PixelDojo capabilities.

Here is the input that I used:

Prompt: woman looks into camera, camera zooms out until she is in full view of camera, she stands at pole, moves slowly in sexy way

Start and end images:

 

Summary:

• Kenerate WAN 2.2 is more then 4 times more expensive than PixelDojo WAN 2.2.
• Kenerate does not obey camera prompt instructions.
• Kenerate does not obey last image as last frame.

Therefore, this site gets a NO as a PixelDojo replacement.

PixelDojo is now unusable

Since November 2025 I have used PixelDojo, and mostly the WAN 2.2 "spicy" model.

On 21 August 2026 I got the last message from the PixelDojo Discord server about news on PixelDojo. When I now tried to access them, the server no longer exists.

And when trying PixelDojo, WAN 2.2 functionality appears to be crippled. No more start and end image. 

And it is more expensive: instead of 3 credits, it is now 5 credits for 5 seconds.

I tried WAN 3.0 - just no comparison. Uploaded 4 pics, and the video just jumped to the pics instead of a smooth transition. This is useless for me, and expensive - 75 credits for 30 seconds 

Here are discussions and speculations on what has happened with PixelDojo:

https://www.reddit.com/r/PixelDojoAI/ 

Update:

It turns out that the WAN 2.2 which I had used up to a few weeks ago has now been renamed to "Video LoRa".

I will give it a try - OK, all the old functionality of WAN 2.2 seems to be there in the "Image to Video LoRa" option, to be selected from the drop-down menu.

---

My opinion is that this demise of PixelDojo is a temporary technical problem. Everything runs very slow at the site, but it appears that the functionality is back, and that new features are being added while the previous features are preserved.